UNESCO CONSULTATION
A word to Gormley on his new archaeology code: Tara
By David Kenny
“THIS boys,” said Mr Halpin, “will stay with you forever. I hope it makes a big impact.”
Ordinarily, whenever a teacher spoke of making an ‘impact’ at St Joseph’s National School in Glasthule, you started sweating. It normally involved the crack of a bamboo cane. Not on this occasion though. We were about to see something historic. Besides, Halpin always preferred sarcasm to brutality.
He was a bit of a hero. He played Mungo Jerry records in class and showed us how to make free plectrums out of detergent bottles. He also liked cartoons and had a wit as dry as a pub on Good Friday. He seemed to actually like us.
The historic occasion took place on a trip to the National Library in 1979. Myself and two other 11-year-olds, Cianan and Mick, were to choose books for the school. The four of us clowned the day away with Mr Halpin leading the laughter. Afterwards, he took us to see a part of Dublin he hoped we’d remember forever. He hoped seeing it would make an impact on our young minds. It did.
I can still see, through a gap in the hoarding, the muddy timber steps of Wood Quay. “This is going,” he said. “The council is covering it with concrete.” All the way home we simmered with anger, fuelled by his. He told us how protestors had found swords in the builders’ rubble and how the city walls had been razed. He explained how the quay had been named a national monument but the government destroyed it anyway. He told us the only people who wanted the ugly new buildings were politicians.
I still get angry when I pass Wood Quay. Halpin had given us a mental snapshot of our disappearing history. I’ll always have it in my head. Last week, I saw Wood Quay again when John Gormley announced a new archaeological code of practice to protect our monuments. There was the clang of a rusty gate being bolted and the distant neighing of a horse. This is the man who sold Tara to get into bed with Fianna Fail – the party which was responsible for Wood Quay.
Despite being ‘Green’, he has done nothing to halt the M3 ploughing through the Tara/Skryne valley. Instead he has concentrated on defending his predecessor’s demolition of the Lismullin national monument which lay in its way.
Dick Roche contravened European law by failing to commission an environmental impact study on the site. The government has now spent huge sums fighting the European Commission over the issue.
Gormley also spent a bundle drafting last week’s Eirgrid Code of Practice. If the European Court finds against Ireland, the National Monuments Act will have to be amended and the code will have to be redrafted. More money flushed away.
The M3 tolls will go out of Meath to a multinational. More waste.
The mishandling of Tara proves, conclusively, that we are being governed by profligate idiots. The M3 should never have been routed through Tara/Skryne. It was always going to throw up monuments like Lismullin and lead to costly court battles. The obvious thing to do was to route to the west of Tara, avoiding the valley.
The Greens campaigned against the M3. The World Monuments Fund and the Smithsonian Institution have placed it on their their ‘endangered’ lists. Gormley is still pushing ahead with it though.
In December, he hired 15 experts to help draft a list of sites, including Tara, to nominate to Unesco for world heritage status at its annual meeting last Tuesday. No list was delivered.
TaraWatch is continuing its campaign to re-route the road with a protest at the Dail this Wednesday (1pm). They will ask Gormley why the Unesco list wasn’t submitted as it would have tested the M3’s impact on Tara’s heritage status. They will also tell him that his new archaeological code of practice is meaningless while Tara is being vandalised.
Gormley’s betrayal of Tara/Skryne is endorsing Fianna Fail’s traditional approach to the environment – “cover it over with concrete”. That party’s love of unbridled development is the reason why places like Meath became an overspill for Dublin and why its roads desperately need to be improved. They mustn’t be improved at the expense of Tara. It’s bound up with our history. For 800 years it tied our ancestors to a legendary past which was ultimately used to stir up revolution and create our Republic.
The world sees Tara as our spiritual centre. It even features in one of the most popular novels/films of all time. Scarlett O’Hara’s plantation is named after it in Gone With the Wind. Her fictional Tara represents the Irish emigrant’s longing for home. Our real one now stands for longing to get home from work quicker. We need Unesco to protect Tara from ourselves.
Our generation stood by as the government over-developed our country. What will our legacy be? Some Namaesque hulks of buildings? Some half-built estates? A concrete dagger through the heart of Tara? Is this what we want to leave behind for future schoolchildren and young teachers like the late Mr Halpin?
I can imagine him surveying the M3 and sardonically quoting Scarlett’s famous line: “Is Tara still standing or is it gone with the wind?”
Scarlet? He’d be crimson with anger.
WRITE TO: editorial@tribune.ie
WELCOME
Welcome to the information website for the Hill of Tara complex UNESCO World Heritage Site public consultation process. The Department of the Environment is currently holding a public consultation on a review of Ireland’s Tentative List of UNESCO World Heritage Sites, while the Department of Transport is building the M3 motorway through the middle of the cultural landscape containing the Hill of Tara. This site is hosted by Tarawatch, who are campaigning for full preservation of the Hill of Tara, Ireland’s ancient capital and the re-routing of the M3 motorway. The purpose of this site is to ensure that all stakeholders get an opportunity to participate in the public consultation. The Minister for the Environment has appointed an Expert Advisory Panel, to conduct the review of the Tentative List, and it is Chaired by Lord Hankey, President of ICOMOS, UK. Email the Panel: worldheritagetentativelist@environ.ie
TARAWATCH NOMINATION OF THE HILL OF TARA
TaraWatch successfully nominated the Hill of Tara to the World Monuments Fund (WMF), List of 100 Most Endangered Sites 2008-9 and Tara was also featured in the March 2009 issue of Smithsonian Magazine, as one of 10 must-see endangered cultural sites before they disappear. An nomination has also been made to the 2010 WMF list.
TaraWatch submitted a UNESCO nomination form to the Expert Advisory Panel for the Hill of Tara to be a World Heritage Site, but only on condition that the M3 motorway is re-routed away from the site. There is no doubt that Tara has always been a site of outstanding universal value, and little doubt it will be placed on the Tentative List. The only question is whether UNESCO approves the site, with the M3 passing through the cultural landscape and archaeological complex, which is approximately 5 km wide.


‘ROYAL IRISH SITES’ NOMINATION
The Department of the Environment is proposing to submit a ’serial nomination’ to UNESCO entitled ‘Royal irish Sites’, which includes:
-
The Tara complex, (seat of the Kings of Meath and High Kings)
-
Cashel (seat of the Munster Kings)
-
Dun Ailinne and the Hill of Uisneach, (seats of the Leinster Kings)
-
Rathcroghan Complex (seat of the Kings of Connaught)
TaraWatch is urging the Department of the Environment to partner with the Northern Ireland Environment Agency and submit a Transboundary Nomination for all ‘Royal Irish Sites’, rather than just those sites in the South, currently being proposed. It appears that Eamhain Macha (Navan Fort), seat of the Ulster Kings, may be left out of the proposed ‘Royal Irish Sites’ grouping, because it is outside the jurisdiction. Eamhain Mach is an integral part of the provincial royal landscape. It is established UNESCO policy that Transboundary nominations are preferred by the World Heritage Committee.

